基于亲和度法测度湖北省植被格局多样性

程腊梅; 葛继稳; 吴兆俊; 王自业; 李建峰

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.20124

基于亲和度法测度湖北省植被格局多样性

程腊梅^1,2,
葛继稳^1, ,,
吴兆俊^1,3,
王自业¹,
李建峰^1,4

1.
中国地质大学湿地演化与生态恢复湖北省重点实验室, 生态环境研究所, 武汉 430074
2. 武汉新江城环境事务咨询有限责任公司, 武汉 430015
3. 武汉市环境保护科学研究院, 武汉 430072
4. 西藏自治区水利电力规划勘测设计研究院, 拉萨 850000

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(40972218);中国地质大学(武汉)中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(G1323521125,G1323521225)资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
程腊梅(1985- ),女,硕士研究生,主要从事植被生态学研究(E-mail: 853253102@qq.com)。

通讯作者:
葛继稳, E-mail: gejiwen2002@yahoo.com.cn

中图分类号: Q948.15
计量
- 文章访问数: 1205
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1650
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-07-29
- 修回日期: 2013-01-07
- 发布日期: 2013-04-29

Measuring Pattern Diversity of Hubei Province Vegetation Based on Affinity Analysis

1.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Wetland Evolution & Ecological Restoration, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2. Wuhan Xinjiangcheng Environmental Affairs Consulting Limited Liability Company, Wuhan 430015, China
3. Wuhan Environmental Protection Sciences Research Institute, Wuhan 430072, China
4. Tibet Investigation and Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Electric Power, Lhasa 850000, China

摘要

摘要: 以植物群系为指标,采用亲和度分析法测度湖北省的植被格局多样性。研究结果表明,湖北省植被格局的镶嵌多样性值(mosaic diversity,m)为4.071,景观复杂,不存在明显的生态梯度。根据平均亲和度(mean affinities,MA),可将湖北省的植被划分为3类:第一类为中心点,位于中心点的植被比较典型和常见,对联结整个景观的各斑块起着关键的作用,包括武汉市、襄阳市、黄冈市和随州市等4个分区;第二类为外点,位于外点的植被较为珍稀,多为当地特有,对构成整个植被格局的独特性和多样性意义重大,包括鹤峰县、利川市和咸丰县等3个分区;第三类为中间点,位于中间点的植被普遍度和稀有度适中,占据了较多的生境空间,是构成整个湖北省植被格局的基础,包括黄石市、荆州市、荆门市、宜昌市等14个分区。将平均相似性值(mean similarity, MS)从中心点到外点排序,结果表明,毗邻地区相似性高,鄂东北、鄂西北、鄂东南以及江汉平原构成了整个植被格局的普遍性,鄂西南则构成其独特性。湖北省植被格局东部和西部差异较大,比较复杂。
- 亲和度分析 /
- 镶嵌多样性 /
- 植被格局 /
- 湖北省
Abstract: Taking formation as an index, the vegetation pattern diversity of Hubei Province was measured by affinity analysis. Results showed that mosaic diversity (m) of the Hubei Province vegetation landscape was 4.071, the landscape was complicated and there was no obvious ecological gradient. According to mean affinities (MA), the Hubei Province vegetation pattern was divided into three categories: the first central point category included vegetation from Wuhan City, Xiangyang City, Huanggang City and Suizhou City, which were typical, common, and played a key role in coupling patches in the whole vegetation pattern; the second outer point category included vegetation from Hefeng County, Lichuan City and Xianfeng County, which were rare, native and had important significance in composing the specificity and diversity of the whole landscape; the third middle point category included vegetation from Huangshi City, Jingzhou City, Jingmen City, and Yichang City (totally 14 administrative division units), which showed universality and rarity, were moderate, occupied more habitat space, and constituted the foundation of the whole vegetation pattern. Sorting mean similarity (MS) from central points to outer points showed that the similarity of adjacent regions was high. Northwest, Southeast and the Jianghan plain of Hubei formed the universality of the whole vegetation pattern; however Southwest Hubei constituted the specificity of the vegetation pattern. Large differences existed in the vegetation patterns between east and west Hubei Province, and the vegetation patterns were complicated.
- Affinity analysis /
- Mosaic diversity /
- Vegetation pattern diversity /
- Hubei Province

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	傅伯杰, 陈利顶. 景观多样性的类型及其生态意义 [J]. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 454-462.
[2]	宋树龙, 李贞. 广州城市植被景观多样性分析[J]. 热带地理, 2000, 20(2): 121-124.
[3]	马克明, 傅伯杰, 周华峰. 景观多样性测度: 格局多样性的亲和度分析[J]. 生态学报, 1998,18(1):76-81.
[4]	孙宇, 邵小明, 刘欣超, 刘炎彬. 北京东灵山主要森林植被中苔藓植物的物种多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(11): 1725-1731.
[5]	孙荣, 袁兴中, 刘红, 陈忠礼, 张跃伟. 三峡水库小罗带植物群落组成及物种多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(2): 208-214.
[6]	张彩虹, 李巍岳, 胡志斌, 朱教君, 闫巧玲. 基于RS与GIS的乔木层物种多样性分布格局——以辽东山区水源涵养林为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(2): 1749-1755.
[7]	冯建孟, 徐成东. 云南西部地区地带性植物群落物种多样性的地理分布格局[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4): 595-600.
[8]	Schnitzler A. Comparison of landscape diversity in forests of the upper Rhine and the middle Loire [JP3]floodplains [J]. Biodivers Conserv, 1996, 5: 743-758.
[9]	Fabricius C, Palmer A R, Burger M. Landscape diversity in a conservation area and commercial and communal rangeland in xeric succulent thicket [JP3]south Africa [J]. Landscape Ecol, 2002, 17: 531-537.
[10]	王立海, 孟春. 小兴安岭带岭林区红松阔叶林景观多样性与稳定性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(12): 2267-2270.
[11]	马克明, 傅伯杰, 周华锋. 北京东灵山地区森林的物种多样性和景观格局多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 9(1): 1-7.
[12]	白顺江, 陆贵巧, 谷建才, 张锁成, 郑辉, 王雄宾. 雾灵山物种多样性及景观格局多样性的研究 [J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2006, 29(2): 60-64.
[13]	Ortega M, Elenna-Rosello R, Garcia Del Barrio J M. Estimation of plant diversity at landscape level: A methodological approach applied to three Spa-nish rural areas [J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2004, 95: 97-116.
[14]	Riitters K H, O'Neill R V, Hunsaker C T, Wickham J D, Yankee D H, Timmins S P, Jones K B, Jackson B L. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics [J]. Landscape Ecol, 1995, 10: 23-39.
[15]	潘韬, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 赵东升, 尹云鹤. 纵向岭谷区植被景观多样性的空间格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(12): 3091-3098.
[16]	王宏志, 陈诚, 徐建军. 湖北省植被覆盖指数时空分布特征研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2007, (4): 49-50.
[17]	李宪坡. 湖北省城市景观结构及其动态变化分析 [J]. 湖北大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 26(4):354-359.
[18]	樊亚明. 湖北省典型城市绿地景观比较研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2004.
[19]	隋晓丽, 李仁东, 朱超洪. 湖北省土地利用变化格局的区域分异研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 55-59.
[20]	Scheiner [JP3]S M, Istock C A. Affinity analysis: metho-dologies and statistical inference[J]. Plant Ecol, 1987, 72: 89-93.
[21]	Istock C A, Scheiner S M. Affinities and high-order diversity within landscape mosaics[J]. Evol Ecol, 1987, 1: 11-29.
[22]	Scheiner S M. Measuring pattern diversity[J]. Ecology, 1992, 73: 1860-1867.
[23]	郭连金. 苏门白酒草对乡土植物群落种间联结性及稳定性的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2011, 40(2): 18-23.
[24]	王映明. 湖北省植被分类的研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 1986, 4(3): 239-252.
[25]	郑重. 湖北植物区系特点与植物分布概况的研究 [J]. 武汉植物学研究, 1983, 1(2): 165-175.