Advance Search
YI Ting-Shuang, LI Heng, LI De-Zhu. The Course of Change and Development of the Classification Systems of the Araceae[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2002, 20(1): 48-61.
Citation: YI Ting-Shuang, LI Heng, LI De-Zhu. The Course of Change and Development of the Classification Systems of the Araceae[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2002, 20(1): 48-61.

The Course of Change and Development of the Classification Systems of the Araceae

More Information
  • Received Date: August 12, 2001
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: February 23, 2002
  • The taxonomic history of the Araceae of the world is briefed in this paper. An attention is made to survey the evolution of the systems after 1832 when Schott published the first system of classification of the Araceae. The major taxonomic systems of the Araceae are those of Schott (1860), Hooker (1883), Engler (1920), Hutchinson (1959), Grayum (1990), the Engler's system revised by Bogner and Nicolson (1991), and the system of Mayo et al (1997). The principles on which each system was based are briefly discussed. The cource of change at sub-familiar and tribal levals and development of the major systems are preliminarily surveyed. Comments on the main contributions of these systems are also presented. In additon, some notes are made on the change of the systematic arrangement of the Araceae at generic and specific levals since 1979 when the aroid volume of the Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae was published. Finally, for a better understanding of the phylogeny in the near future, some unresolved problems of the above-mentioned systems are explored and some remarks on the future study of this important family are presented.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chen Zhi-Xiang, Stephen R Downie, Wang Qi-Zhi. Review on the taxonomy, origin, and evolution of Sanicula (Umbelliferae)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2018, 36(1): 136-143. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.10136
    [2]JIANG Yan-Bin, SHAO Xiao-Ming. Research Review on the Distribution and Diversity of Bryophytes[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(3): 385-390. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.30385
    [3]SUO Zhi-Li. A Review on the Phylogenetics of Nymphaeaceae[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2006, 24(2): 173-182.
    [4]ZHANG Xue-Jie, FAN Shou-Jin, SUN Zhi-Ying, LI Fa-Zeng. A Summary on Phytogenetic Classification of Brassicaceae from China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2003, 21(3): 267-272.
    [5]WANG Wei, ZHAO Nan-Xian. Epidermal Characters of Leaves in Araceae[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2002, 20(5): 343-349.
    [6]Li Fazeng, Zhang Xuejie. A SUMMARY ON PHYTOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF ULMACEAE FROM CHINA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2000, 18(5): 412-416.
    [7]Hong Yaping, Zhong Yang, Chen Zhiduan. DESIGNS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS OF E-FLORA AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR INTERACTING CLASSIFICATIONS── Ⅱ.A SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING A CLASSIFICATION AND[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(4): 379-382.
    [8]Wang Qichao, Zhang Xingyan, Hu Chungen. NEW SYSTEM FOR LOTUS VARIETY CLASSIFICATION[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1997, 15(1): 19-26.
    [9]Liu Mingyuan. A REVIEW ABOUT[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1991, 9(1): 99-100.
    [10]Wang Yingming. STUDIES ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF VEGETATION IN HUBEI PROVINCE Ⅰ. NATURAL VEGETATION[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1986, 4(3): 239-252.

Catalog

    Article views (1971) PDF downloads (3028) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return