Advance Search
Lu Liuxin. A STUDY ON EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF THE BASIC CHROMOSOME NUMBER BETWEEN X=10 AND X=11 IN THE POLYANTHOUS DAFFODILS (NARCISSUS TAZATTA L.)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(2): 107-113.
Citation: Lu Liuxin. A STUDY ON EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF THE BASIC CHROMOSOME NUMBER BETWEEN X=10 AND X=11 IN THE POLYANTHOUS DAFFODILS (NARCISSUS TAZATTA L.)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(2): 107-113.

A STUDY ON EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF THE BASIC CHROMOSOME NUMBER BETWEEN X=10 AND X=11 IN THE POLYANTHOUS DAFFODILS (NARCISSUS TAZATTA L.)

More Information
  • Received Date: July 11, 1988
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: May 19, 1990
  • There were two kinds of basic chromosome number, x=10 and x=11, in the polyanthous daffodils(Narcissus tazatta L.).The basic chromosome number x=10 with two kinds of karyotype, one was typical bimodal, i. e., all the chromosome in a set fall into two sharply defined classes, 6 long and 4 short ones; the other one was non-bimodal with 4(or5) long, 2 medium and 4(or3)short chromosomes in a set. The basic chromosome number x=11 was a non-bimodal or non-typical bimodal karyotype with 4(or 5)long, 2 medium and 5 (or 4)short chromosomes in a set.The bimodal karyotype of x=10 was an original one. The x=11 was derived from the original karyotype(x=10, 2n=20) by increasing a pair of short m chromosomes after reciprocal translocation of unequal chromosomal segments in two pairs of long chromosomes (No. 5and No. 6). The other one, x=10 2n=20, new non-bimodal karyotype may be a result of loss the short m chromosome from the x=11 2n=22 karyotype or combination of the male and female n gametes without the m chromosome after translocation.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chen Zhi-Xiang, Stephen R Downie, Wang Qi-Zhi. Review on the taxonomy, origin, and evolution of Sanicula (Umbelliferae)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2018, 36(1): 136-143. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.10136
    [2]Liang Ying-Yi, Pang Xue-Qun, Wang Ting. Mechanism and evolution of fruit type diversity[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2017, 35(6): 912-924. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2017.60912
    [3]Wu Xiao-Ping, Sen Lin, Chen Nan, Zhang Xiao, Ma Zhao-Xia, Zhang Qin-Yu. Study on the molecular evolution of the psaA gene from ferns[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2017, 35(2): 177-185. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2017.20177
    [4]ZHOU Yuan, WANG Bo, GAO Lei, WANG Ting. Adaptive Evolution and Coevolution of the rbcL Gene in Xeric Pteridaceae Ferns[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 1(4): 409-416.
    [5]Wang Chao, Zhang Zongshen, Wang Jianbo. ADVANCES ON STUDIES OF THE ORIGIN AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF POLYPLOID PLANTS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2000, 18(4): 339-343.
    [6]Ge Song. ELECTROPHORETIC DATA AND STUDIES OF PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1994, 12(1): 71-84.
    [7]Fang Deqiu, Zhang Wencai. STUDIES ON THE TAXONOMY AND EVOLUTION OF MANDARINS IN CHINA BY ISOZYMES[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1992, 10(4): 305-312.
    [8]Liang Guolu. STUDIES ON THE CYTOTAXONOMY OF CITRUS Ⅰ. Karyotype and evolution of 30 taxa of the genera Citrus[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(1): 1-7.
    [9]Xu Naiyu. THE TAXONOMY,ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF WHEAT[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1988, 6(2): 187-194.
    [10]Wang Jinwu, Li Maoxue, Li Lixia. STUDIES ON THE CYTOTAXONOMY OF POLYGONATUM Ⅰ.Karyotypes and evolution of eight species of Polygonatum in China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1987, 5(1): 1-10.

Catalog

    Article views (4413) PDF downloads (2101) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return