Advance Search
Fan Zhi-Xia, Chen Yue-Yue, Fu He-Ling. Study on drought resistance and leaf structure in 10 species of garden shrubs in Chengdu[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(1): 70-78. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.10070
Citation: Fan Zhi-Xia, Chen Yue-Yue, Fu He-Ling. Study on drought resistance and leaf structure in 10 species of garden shrubs in Chengdu[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(1): 70-78. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.10070

Study on drought resistance and leaf structure in 10 species of garden shrubs in Chengdu

Funds: This work was supported by a grant from the National Science and Technology Support Program Project (2013BAJ02B03)
More Information
  • Received Date: August 06, 2018
  • Revised Date: September 04, 2018
  • Published Date: February 27, 2019
  • The leaf anatomical structure of 10 species of common garden shrubs in Chengdu were observed by paraffin sectioning and nail polish sealing. Indicators were measured and analyzed, which included thickness of main vein, thickness of leaf, cuticle thickness of upper epidermis, cuticle thickness of lower epidermis, thickness of upper epidermis, thickness of lower epidermis, thickness of palisade tissue, thickness of spongy tissue, stoma density of lower epidermis, stoma length, stoma width, and compactness and thickness ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue. Through variance and principal component analyses, representative indicators were selected, and drought resistance was evaluated among species by membership function. Results showed that the 13 indicators exhibited significant differences among the 10 garden shrubs, with variation coefficients ranging from 17.40%-68.20%. The 10 species belonged to bifacial leaves and their tissue structures were well recognized. The cuticle of the lower epidermis of Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd was too thin to obtain specific measurement data. Leaf structure compactness, ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue, stoma density, stoma length, stoma width, and thickness of palisade tissue were the main indices able to evaluate drought resistance of the 10 shrubs. Drought resistance in descending order was Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum Yieh, Schefflera octophylla(Lour.) Harms, Photinia fraseri Dress, Gardenia jasminoides Ellis, Rhododendron hybrida Hort., Pittosporum tobira(Thunb.) Ait., Camellia japonica L., Buxus bodinieriLevl., B. spectabilis Willd, Euonymus japonicus var. aureo-marginatus Hort. Furthermore, L. chinense var . rubrum Yieh, S.octophylla(Lour.) Harms, P. fraseri Dress, and G. jasminoides Ellis were strong drought resistant varieties and could be widely cultivated on roofs and slopes.
  • [1]
    黄雪菊,孙辉,唐亚. 城市化背景下成都市水资源安全及可持续发展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2004,26(5):74-78. Huang XJ,Sun H,Tang Y. Security and sustainability of water resource in Chengdu in the 21st century[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D,2004,26(5):74-78.
    [2]
    张红霞,刘果厚,崔秀萍. 干旱对浑善达克沙地榆叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 植物研究,2005,25(1):39-44.Zhang HX,Liu GH,Cui XP. Affection of aridity to anatomical structure of leave of Ulmus pumila L. var. sabulosa[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2005,25(1):39-44.
    [3]
    李波,陈雪梅,李铁缘,高云鹏,李红. 2种不同抗旱性冰草叶片解剖结构的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学,2015,43(9):247-249.
    [4]
    史晓霞,张国芳,孟林,毛培春,刘自学. 马蔺叶片解剖结构特征与其抗旱性关系研究[J]. 植物研究,2008,28(5):584-588.Shi XX,Zhang GF,Meng L,Mao PC,Liu ZX. Relationship between the leaf tissue characteristic and drought resistance of Iris lactea Pall. var. chinensis (Fisch.)[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2008,28(5):584-588.
    [5]
    董晓民,张安宁,刘伟,李桂祥,胡广波,滕兴荣,张守民. 扁桃及普通桃品种的叶片解剖结构及耐旱性分析[J]. 山东农业科学,2017,49(11):45-47.Dong XM,Zhang AN,Liu W,Li GX,Hu GB,Teng XR,Zhang SM. Leaf anatomical structures and drought resis tance analysis of almond and common each varieties[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2017,49(11):45-47.
    [6]
    杨森,张晓飞,高新生,李维国. 5个品系橡胶树叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性分析[J]. 热带生物学报,2017,8(3):301-306. Yang S,Zhang XF,Gao XS,Li WG. Leaf anatomical structure and drought resistance analysis of 5 rubber clones (Hevea brasiliensis)[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology,2017,8(3):301-306.
    [7]
    唐婧文,吴思政,梁文斌,李建挥,柏文富,禹霖,聂东伶. 湖南引种蓝莓叶片结构特征的比较及其耐旱性研究[J]. 经济林研究,2017,35(4):90-98.Tang JW,Wu SZ,Liang WB,Li JH,Bai WF,Yu L,Nie DL. Leaf structure characteristics and drought resistance of blueberry in Hunan Province[J]. Nonwood Forest Research,2017,35(4):90-98.
    [8]
    刘娜,宋柏权,杨骥. 不同播期甜菜纸筒苗解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J]. 中国糖料,2016,38(6):10-12.Liu N,Song BQ,Yang J. Analysis of drought resistance on anatomical leaf structure of paper-tube sugar beet seedlings with different sowing date[J]. Sugar Crops of China,2016,38(6):10-12.
    [9]
    潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,王军辉,何茜,苏艳,马建伟,杜坤. 基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2015,36(2):61-68.Pan X,Qiu Q,Li JY,Wang JH,He Q,Su Y,Ma JW,Du K. Drought resistance evaluation based on leaf anatomical structures of 25 shrubs on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University,2015,36(2):61-68.
    [10]
    杨小玉. 5种沙生灌木叶片解剖结构与抗旱性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2008.
    [11]
    韩刚,李少雄,徐鹏,韩恩贤. 6种灌木叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J]. 西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):43-46.Han G,Li SX,Xu P,Han EX. Analysis of drought resis tance on anatomical structure of leave of six species of shrubs[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2006,21(4):43-46.
    [12]
    周仪. 植物形态解剖实验[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.
    [13]
    李芬. 细胞生物学实验技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [14]
    刘明智,努尔巴衣·阿布都沙力克,潘晓玲. 指甲油涂抹撕取法制取植物叶气孔装片[J]. 生物学通报, 2005,40(10):44-45.Liu MZ,Nuerbayi A,Pan XL. Preparation of plant leaf stomatal patches by nail polish smearing and tearing[J]. Biological Bulletin,2005,40(10):44-45.
    [15]
    刘红茹,冯永忠,王得祥,崔宏安. 延安城区10种阔叶园林植物叶片结构及其抗旱性评价[J]. 西北植物学报,2012,32(10):2053-2060.Liu HR,Fen YZ,Wang DX,Cui HA. Drought resistance evaluation and leaf structures of ten species of broad-leaved ornamental plants in Yan'an urban area[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2012,32(10):2053-2060.
    [16]
    李扬汉. 植物学[M]. 第2版. 上海:科学技术出版社,1995.
    [17]
    朱栗琼,李吉跃,招礼军. 六种阔叶树叶片解剖结构特征及其耐旱性比较[J]. 广西植物,2007,27(3):431-434.Zhu LQ,Li JY,Zhao LJ. Comparison on leaf anatomical structures and drought resistance of six broad-leaved plant species[J]. Guihaia,2007,27(3):431-434.
    [18]
    石登红,陈训. 6种杜鹃花属(Rhododendron)植物叶片结构的研究[J]. 贵州科学,2005,23(3):39-45.Shi DH,Chen X. Study on the leaf blade structure of six species of Rhododendron[J]. Guizhou Science,2005,23(3):39-45.
    [19]
    薛智德,韩蕊莲,侯庆春,王胜琪,张振师.延安地区5种灌木叶旱性结构的解剖研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2004,24(7):1200-1206. Xue ZD,Han RL,Hou QC,Wang SQ,Zhang ZS. Anatomical study of xeromorphism of leaves in cutting for five brushes in Yan'an region[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2004,24(7):1200-1206.
    [20]
    任媛媛,刘艳萍,王念,罗晓雅,翟晓巧. 9种屋顶绿化阔叶植物叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(4):64-68. Ren YY,Liu YP,Wang N,Luo XY,Zhai XQ. 〖JP+2〗The relationship between leaf anatomic structure and drought resistance of nine broadleaf plants[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2014,38(4):64-68.
    [21]
    蒋忠荣. 沙冬青抗旱性机理的探讨[J]. 中国沙漠,2000,20(1):70-74.Jiang ZR. Probe into drought-resisting mechanism of Ammopitanthus mongolicus (Maxim) Cheng F.〖KG-*6〗[J]. Journal of Desert Research,2000,20(1):70-74.
    [22]
    杜华栋,徐翠红,刘萍,焦菊英,苗芳. 陕北黄土高原优势植物叶片解剖结构的生态适应性[J]. 西北植物学报,2010,30(2):293-300.Du HD,Xu CH,Liu P,Jiao JY,Miao F. Foliar anatomical structures and ecological adaptabilities of dominant plants in the north Shaanxi loess plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2010,30(2):293-300.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HU Guang-ming, XIA Wen-juan, ZHENG Li, RAO Hang-kong, LEI Ming, WANG Jian, ZHAO Ting-ting, LI Zuo-zhou, ZHONG Cai-hong. Investigation and fruit genetic diversity analysis of wild Actinidia germplasm resources in Tongshan County, Hubei Province[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(6): 620-631. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.60620
    [2]Chen Mei-Yan, Zhao Ting-Ting, Liu Xiao-Li, Han Fei, Zhang Peng, Zhong Cai-Hong. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of ‘Jinyan’ kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha×Actinidia chinensis)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(1): 85-92. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.10085
    [3]WANG Rong, HE Zhi-Chong, FANG Xue-Min, CHEN Dan-Li, WANG Qi, MENG Jia-Song, ZHAO Da-Qiu. Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity of Paeonia lactiflora Cultivars in Yangzhou[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(6): 901-908. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901
    [4]YANG Xiao-Hui, ZHAO Xue-Li, GAO Xin-Fen. Morphological Variation and ITS Sequence Analysis of the Indigofera szechuensis Complex[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 727-733. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60727
    [5]CAI Jun-Long, LU Jin-Qing, LI Qiang, GUO Sheng-Nan, DAI Yi. Analysis on Volatile Components of Caryophylli Flos from Different Habitats[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(2): 251-258. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.20251
    [6]CHEN Sui-Qing, SONG Jun, CUI Can. Research and Evaluation on Chemical Fingerprints of Diterpenoids from Rabdosia rubescens[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 519-527. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50519
    [7]SHU Xiao, YANG Zhi-Ling, YANG Xu, DUAN Hong-Ping, YU Hua-Hui, LIU Ruo-Nan. Variation in Traits of Magnolia officinalis Seedlings from Different Provenances and Their Principal Component Analysis[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(5): 623-630.
    [8]LI Ren-Wei, ZHANG Hung-Ta. Analysis on the Components of Seed Plant Flora in Sichuan Region[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2002, 20(5): 381-386.
    [9]Xiong Xiufang, Zhang Yinhua, Gong Fujun, Nan Peng, Yuan Ping, Wang Guoliang. STUDIES ON THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF THE VOLATILE OIL FROM CHENOPODIUM AMBROSIOIDES L.GROWN IN HUBEI[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1999, 17(3): 244-248.
    [10]He Jingbiao, Sun Xiangzhong, Wang Huiqin, Zhong Yang, Huang Deshi. ANALYSES ON THE CHARACTERS OF THE GENUS OTTELIA (HYDROCHARITACEAE) IN CHINA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1992, 10(2): 101-108.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(24)

    1. 胡星,胡纪龙,张敏,刘娇,黄晓霞. 外源NO对盐胁迫下八角金盘叶片生理特性及解剖结构的影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2025(01): 68-77 .
    2. 张伟溪,丁密,苏晓华,李爱平,王小江,余金金,李政宏,黄秦军,丁昌俊. 小叶杨×欧洲黑杨杂交F_1代生长及叶片解剖结构杂种优势分析与抗旱性评价. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 46-58 .
    3. 赵莹. 叶形与叶色在园林景观设计中的应用. 分子植物育种. 2025(02): 622-627 .
    4. 邱彦芬,杨湉,吴裕. 基于叶片解剖结构评价不同倍性橡胶树无性系抗旱性. 热带农业科技. 2024(02): 61-67 .
    5. 萨其拉,张霞,朱琳,康萨如拉. 长期不同放牧强度下荒漠草原优势种无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构变化. 植物生态学报. 2024(03): 331-340 .
    6. 胡光明,肖涛,彭家清,李大卫,田华,王华玲,肖丽丽,程均欢,黄海雷,吴伟,钟彩虹. 基于叶片形态及显微特征评价12个猕猴桃栽培品种的抗旱性. 果树学报. 2024(05): 911-928 .
    7. 刘柯珍,何诚. 微观视角下防火树种特征研究动态. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(03): 212-220 .
    8. 肖刚,赵峰,李世民,刘帅,路艳. 高速公路中央分隔带绿化植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应和抗旱性评价. 山东交通科技. 2024(03): 81-85 .
    9. 罗玲,刘伟,梁东,马一君,李然,吕秀兰. 不同架形对阳光玫瑰葡萄叶幕生态和高温下应逆生理的影响. 果树学报. 2024(12): 2444-2462 .
    10. 侯立伟,鲁绍伟,李少宁,赵娜,徐晓天. 城市绿化灌木耐旱性评价及灌溉制度研究进展. 世界林业研究. 2023(01): 45-51 .
    11. 孙一鑫,马乐乐,苗丽丽,何佳星,李建明. 基于光辐射时滞效应的温室番茄蒸腾量模型的构建. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 83-92 .
    12. 何桥,向海洋,向芳,黄明,陈栋,向素琼,郭启高,梁国鲁,熊伟. 野生李用于巫山脆李砧木的适宜性研究. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 74-87 .
    13. 马静,贺熙勇,陶亮,吴超,李志强,宫丽丹. 基于叶片解剖结构的澳洲坚果种质资源抗旱性评价. 热带作物学报. 2023(07): 1392-1399 .
    14. 仇杰,高超,罗洪发. 贵州西北喀斯特区古茶树叶片解剖结构及抗旱性评价. 西北植物学报. 2023(07): 1170-1184 .
    15. 董淑龙,马姜明,莫燕华,黎露. 红花檵木种质资源与应用研究综述. 广西林业科学. 2022(02): 290-297 .
    16. 董志君,高健洲,于晓南. 烯效唑对盆栽芍药生理特性及显微结构的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(07): 117-125 .
    17. 王菲,程小毛,肖云龙,黄晓霞. 千家寨野生古茶树叶片解剖结构和化学组分计量特征对海拔梯度的适应. 生态学杂志. 2021(07): 1958-1968 .
    18. 景晨娟,陈雪峰,王端,季文章,武晓红. 三个李子品种叶片结构差异及其抗旱性分析. 北方园艺. 2021(15): 27-34 .
    19. 钟灶发,张利娟,高思思,彭婷. 干旱胁迫下4种柑橘砧木叶片细胞学特征及抗旱性比较. 园艺学报. 2021(08): 1579-1588 .
    20. 周荧,王頔,聂飞. 贵州省两个蓝莓品种组培苗和扦插苗干旱胁迫响应. 南方农业. 2021(20): 171-174+178 .
    21. 郭燕,张树航,李颖,张馨方,王广鹏. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价. 园艺学报. 2020(06): 1033-1046 .
    22. 董章宏,尹亚梅,徐剑,李显煌,瞿绍宏,辛静,常晓勇,辛培尧. 滇杨雌、雄株茎叶解剖结构差异分析. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2020(03): 502-510 .
    23. 谭莎,赖路伟,黄永芳,叶小萍,谭健彬,许雄坚. 3个山茶品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 亚热带植物科学. 2020(05): 335-339 .
    24. 崔杰,洪文君,刘俊,陈伟玉,何书奋,罗金环. 极小种群野生植物海南假韶子结构解剖特征研究. 广东农业科学. 2019(11): 31-36 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Article views (750) PDF downloads (656) Cited by(46)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return