热带喀斯特森林常绿和落叶榕树的水力特征和水分关系与抗旱策略

刘金玉; 付培立; 王玉杰; 曹坤芳

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50484

热带喀斯特森林常绿和落叶榕树的水力特征和水分关系与抗旱策略

刘金玉^1,2,
付培立^1,2,
王玉杰^1,3,
曹坤芳^1, ,

1.
中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 云南勐腊 666303
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039
3. 中国科学技术大学, 合肥 230027

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31170399)。

详细信息

通讯作者:
曹坤芳, E-mail: caokf@xtbg.ac.cn

中图分类号: Q945
计量
- 文章访问数: 3063
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1889
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-04-11
- 修回日期: 2012-05-13
- 发布日期: 2012-10-29

Different Drought-adaptation Strategies as Characterized by Hydraulic and Water-relations Traits of Evergreen and Deciduous Figs in a Tropical Karst Forest

1.
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China

摘要

摘要: 以热带喀斯特地区的直脉榕(Ficus orthoneura)和豆果榕(F.pisocarpa)为实验材料,研究了常绿和落叶树木枝条和叶片的解剖结构特征、光合水分特征和耐旱性的差异,目的在于探讨不同生活型榕树适应干旱生境的策略。直脉榕和豆果榕的叶片都有两层栅栏组织、游离状的海绵组织和钟乳体等旱生结构,同时叶片角质层蒸腾速率(g_min)和气孔导度(g_s)相对较低。但与落叶的豆果榕相比,常绿的直脉榕的枝条木质部失去50%传导率的水势(P₅₀)和g_min更低,表现出更保守的水分利用策略。总体上,两种榕树都表现出了对喀斯特干旱生境的良好适应,但是它们的适应策略表现出一定的差别。豆果榕通过落叶度过旱期,而直脉榕在结构和功能上比豆果榕更耐旱。抗旱策略和水分利用策略的不同导致两种榕树的生态位分异,减少了彼此间的水分竞争,有利于它们在喀斯特生境中共存。
- 热带喀斯特森林 /
- 榕树 /
- 抗旱性 /
- 解剖结构特征 /
- 生理生态特征
Abstract: To investigate drought adaptation of evergreen and deciduous fig species occurring in dry karst forests, we compared anatomical traits, stem hydraulic conductivity, leaf water relation traits, photosynthesis, drought-resistance, and seasonal changes in physiology in evergreen Ficus orthoneura and deciduous F.pisocarpa, both of which belong to F.subgen. urostigma. Results showed that the two fig species have adapted to drought in different ways. Both have typical xeromorphic leaf structures, as shown by their two-layered palisade cells, highly-defused sponge cells and cystolith in leaves. They have a low cuticular evaporation (g_min) and stomatal conductance (g_s) to alleviate water loss. However, F.orthoneura possesses a xylem structure more resistant to cavitation and lower g_min and adopts conserved water use to adapt to drought stress and maintains its leaves all year. In contrast, F.pisocarpa escapes from extreme drought stress by shedding leaves at the beginning of the dry season. To compensate the loss of carbon gain in the leafless period, F.pisocarpa has a particularly high rate in hydraulic and photosynthesis during the rainy season.The diversification of drought adaptation and water use reduces their competition for water and makes it possible for these fig species to coexist in the karst topography.
- Tropical karst forests /
- Ficus /
- Drought-resistance /
- Anatomical traits /
- Ecophysiological traits

HTML全文

参考文献(39)

[1]	云南省气候中心.云南干旱简析及近期气象干旱情况分析.云南泸西县气象局,2012-02-25 [2012]. http://www.stats.yn.gov.cn/canton_model1/newsview.aspx?id=1696371.532527-003313-20120225-0003.
[2]	Yuan D X.Karst of China[M].Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1991.
[3]	王洪,朱华,李宝贵.西双版纳石灰山森林植被[J].广西植物, 1997, 17(2): 101-117.
[4]	Zhu H.Ecology and biogeography of the limestone vegetation in southern Yunnan,SW China[M].Yunnan: Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 2002.
[5]	李阳兵,侯建筠,谢德体.中国西南岩溶生态研究进展[J].地理科学, 2002, 22(3): 365-370.
[6]	西双版纳热带森林生态研究组.西双版纳勐仑地区气候特征[J].热带植物研究, 2000, 47: 62-65.
[7]	Levitt J.Responses of plants to environmental stresses (Volume Ⅱ).Water,Radiation,Salt,and other Stresses [M].New York: Academic Press, 1980.
[8]	Hartmann H.Will a 385 million year-struggle for light become a struggle for water and for carbon? —How trees may cope with more frequent climate change-type drought events [J].Global Change Biol, 2011, 17: 642-655.
[9]	Hao G Y,Wang A Y,Liu Z H,Franco A C,Goldstein G,Cao K F.Differentiation in light energy dissipation between hemiepiphytic and non-hemiepiphytic Ficus species with contrasting xylem hydraulic conductivity [J].Tree Physiol, 2011, 31: 626-636.
[10]	Nautiyal S,Badola H K,Pal M,Negi D S.Plant responses to water stress changes in growth,dry matter production,stomatal frequency,and leaf anatomy[J].Biologia Plantarum, 1994, 36: 91-97.
[11]	Passioura J.Water in the Soil-plant-atmosphere Continuum [M].New York: Springer, 1982.
[12]	Heilmeier H,Wartinger A,Erhard M,Zimmermann R,Horn R,Schulze E D.Soil drought increases leaf and whole-plant water use of Prunus dulcis grown in the Negev Desert [J].Oecologia, 2002, 130: 329-336.
[13]	Lambers H,Chapin F S,Pons T L.Plant Physiology Ecology [M].New York: Springer, 1998: 154-209.
[14]	Fu P L,Jiang Y J,Wang A Y,Brodribb T,Zhang J L,Zhu S D,Cao K F.Stem hydraulic traits and leaf water-stress tolerance are coordinated with the leaf phenology of angiosperm trees in an Asian tropical dry forest [J].Ann Bot, 2012, 111(1): 189-199.
[15]	Fan D Y,Jie S L,Liu C C.The trade-off between safety and efficiency in hydraulic architecture in 31 woody species in a karst area [J].Tree Physiol, 2011, 31: 865-877.
[16]	Markesteijn L,Poorter L,Bongers F,Paz H,Sack L.Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree species: coordination of species’ drought and shade tolerance [J].New Phytol, 2011, 191: 480-495.
[17]	Markesteijn L,Poorter L,Paz H,Sack L,Bongers F.Ecological differentiation in xylem cavitation resistance is associated with stem and leaf structural traits[J].Plant Cell Environ, 2011, 34: 137-148.
[18]	Ishida A,Harayama H,Yazaki K.Seasonal variations of gas exchange and water relations in deciduous and evergreen trees in monsoonal dry forests of Thailand[J].Tree Physiol, 2010, 30: 935-945.
[19]	Goldstein G,Rada F,Rundel P,Azocar A,Orozco A.Gas exchange and water relations of evergreen and deciduous tropical savanna trees[J].Ann For Sci, 1989, 46: 448s-453s.
[20]	Wu Z Y,Zhou Z K,Michael G G.Flora of China[M].Beijing: Science Press, 2003: 37-71.
[21]	魏作东,杨大荣,彭艳琼,徐磊.榕树在西双版纳热带雨林生态系统中的作用[J].生态学杂志, 2005, 24(3): 233-237.
[22]	Berg C C.Classification and distribution of Ficus[J].Experientia, 1989, 45: 605-611.
[23]	Scholander P F,Hammel H T,Bradstreet E D,Hemmington E A.Sap pressure in vascular plants[J].Science, 1965, 148: 339-346.
[24]	Tyree M T,Hammel H T.The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relation of the plants by the pressure-bomb technique[J].J Exp Bot, 1972, 23: 267-282.
[25]	Kubiske M E,Abrams M D.Seasonal,diurnal and rehydration-induced variation of pressure-volume relationship in Pseudotsuga menziesii[J].Physiol plantarum, 1991, 83: 107-116.
[26]	Muchow R C,Sinclair T R.Epidermal conductance,stomatal density and stomatal size among genotypes of Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench[J].Plant Cell Environ, 1989, 12: 425-432.
[27]	Holbrook H M,Putz F E.From epiphyte to tree: differences in leaf structure and leaf water relations associated with the transition in growth form in eight species of hemiepiphytes[J].Plant Cell Environ, 1996, 19: 631-642.
[28]	Santiago L S,Goldstein G,Meinzer F C,Fisher J B,Maehado K,Woodruff D,Jones T.Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees[J].Oecologia, 2004, 140: 543-550.
[29]	Cochard H,Cruizat P,Tyree M T.Use of positive pressures to establish vulnerability curves.Further support for the air-seeding hypothesis and implications for pressure-volume analysis[J].Plant Physiol, 1992, 100: 205-209.
[30]	Salleo S,Hinckley T M,Kikuta S B,Lo Gullo M A,Weilgony P,Yoon T M,Richter H.A method for inducing xylem emboli in situ: experiments with a field-grown tree[J].Plant Cell Environ, 1992, 15: 491-497.
[31]	王爱英,姜艳娟,郝广友,曹坤芳.季节性干旱胁迫对石灰山三种常绿优势树种的水分和光合生理的影响[J].云南植物研究, 2008, 30(3): 325-332.
[32]	Hao G Y,Sack L,Wang A Y,Cao K F,Goldstein G.Differentiation of leaf water flux and drought tolerance traits in hemiepiphytic and non-hemiepiphytic Ficus tree species[J].Funct Ecol, 2010, 24: 731-740.
[33]	Hao G Y,Gullermo G,Lawren S.Michele H,Liu Z H,Wang A Y,Rhett H,Su Z H,Cao K F.Ecology of hemiepiphytism in fig species is based on evolutionary correlation of hydraulics and carbon economy[J].Ecology, 2011, 92: 2117-2130.
[34]	Nie Y P,Chen H S,Wang K L,Tan W,Deng P Y,Yang J.Seasonal water use patterns of woody species growing on the continuous dolostone outcrops and nearby thin soils in subtropical China[J].Plant Soil, 2011, 341: 399-412.
[35]	董蕾,曹洪麟,叶万辉,徐志防,吴林芳,陈贻竹.5种喀斯特生境植物叶片解剖结构特征[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2011, 17(5): 747-749.
[36]	Philpott J.A blade tissue study of leaves of forty-seven species of Ficus[J].Botanical gazette, 1953, 115: 15-35.
[37]	Sack L,Cowan P D,Jaikumar N,Holbrook N M.The 'hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species[J].Plant Cell Environ, 2003, 26: 1343-1356.
[38]	廖德宝,白坤栋,曹坤芳,蒋得斌.广西猫儿山中山森林共生的常绿和落叶阔叶树光合特性的季节变化[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2008, 16(3): 205-211.
[39]	白坤栋,蒋得斌,曹坤芳,万贤崇,廖德宝.哀牢山和猫儿山中山常绿和落叶阔叶树光合特性对季节温度变化的响应[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(4): 905-913.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 3063
HTML全文浏览量: 3
PDF下载量: 1889
被引次数: 0

热带喀斯特森林常绿和落叶榕树的水力特征和水分关系与抗旱策略

通讯作者: 曹坤芳, E-mail: caokf@xtbg.ac.cn

计量

出版历程

Different Drought-adaptation Strategies as Characterized by Hydraulic and Water-relations Traits of Evergreen and Deciduous Figs in a Tropical Karst Forest

计量

出版历程

目录

通讯作者:
曹坤芳, E-mail: caokf@xtbg.ac.cn