高级检索+

金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析

曾竞, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 赵高林, 龙川, 李伟, 张兵将, 曲欢, 冯璐

曾竞, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 赵高林, 龙川, 李伟, 张兵将, 曲欢, 冯璐. 金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50459
引用本文: 曾竞, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 赵高林, 龙川, 李伟, 张兵将, 曲欢, 冯璐. 金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50459
ZENG Jing, BU Zhao-Jun, MA Jin-Ze, ZHAO Gao-Lin, LONG Chuan, LI Wei, ZHANG Bing-Jiang, QU Huan, FENG Lu. Interspecific Correlations among Bryophytes and among Bryophytes and Vascular Plants in Two Scales in Jinchuan Peatland[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50459
Citation: ZENG Jing, BU Zhao-Jun, MA Jin-Ze, ZHAO Gao-Lin, LONG Chuan, LI Wei, ZHANG Bing-Jiang, QU Huan, FENG Lu. Interspecific Correlations among Bryophytes and among Bryophytes and Vascular Plants in Two Scales in Jinchuan Peatland[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50459
曾竞, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 赵高林, 龙川, 李伟, 张兵将, 曲欢, 冯璐. 金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2012.50459
引用本文: 曾竞, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 赵高林, 龙川, 李伟, 张兵将, 曲欢, 冯璐. 金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2012.50459
ZENG Jing, BU Zhao-Jun, MA Jin-Ze, ZHAO Gao-Lin, LONG Chuan, LI Wei, ZHANG Bing-Jiang, QU Huan, FENG Lu. Interspecific Correlations among Bryophytes and among Bryophytes and Vascular Plants in Two Scales in Jinchuan Peatland[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2012.50459
Citation: ZENG Jing, BU Zhao-Jun, MA Jin-Ze, ZHAO Gao-Lin, LONG Chuan, LI Wei, ZHANG Bing-Jiang, QU Huan, FENG Lu. Interspecific Correlations among Bryophytes and among Bryophytes and Vascular Plants in Two Scales in Jinchuan Peatland[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 459-467. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2012.50459

金川泥炭地两个尺度下苔藓植物间及其与维管植物间的种间关系分析

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(40971036,30700055,40830535);环保公益性行业科研专项资金项目(201109067)资助。
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    卜兆君, E-mail: buzhaojun@nenu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: Q948.15; Q949.35

Interspecific Correlations among Bryophytes and among Bryophytes and Vascular Plants in Two Scales in Jinchuan Peatland

  • 摘要: 在金川泥炭地设置1 m×1 m和25 cm×25 cm两个尺度的大、小样方进行植被调查,并利用方差比率法、X2检验、Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析方法,定量分析了9种苔藓植物和30种主要维管植物间的种间关系。偏叶泥炭藓、大泥炭藓和尖叶泥炭藓3种优势苔藓植物彼此呈显著负关联,占领着各自不同的生境;该3种优势苔藓植物同伴生苔藓及维管植物主要呈正相关,形成独特的群落,据此划分出4个生态种组。Spearman秩相关分析表明,大样方741个种对中,正联结种对数占49.53%,明显大于小样方666个种对中的41.14%。样方大小对分析植物个体大小差异悬殊的泥炭地植物群落的种间联结的影响巨大。苔藓与维管植物间以及苔藓植物间的种间联结甚至种间关系应在大、小样方中分别探讨更合适。
    Abstract: Two quadrat scales,1 m?1 m and 25 cm?25 cm,were established to investigate the vegetation of the Jinchuan Peatland.Interspecific correlations among 9 bryophytes and 30 main vascular plants were analyzed by X2-test,Pearson correlation,and Spearman rank correlation quantitatively.There were significantly negative associations among three main peatmosses: Sphagnum subsecundum,S.palustre,and S.capillifolium,each of which occupied different habitats.Accordingly,four ecological species groups were classified.Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that positive association amounted to 49.53% of the 741 species pairs in the large quadrats,and more than 41.14% of the 666 species pairs in the small quadrats.This study suggests that quadrat size played a crucial role in analyzing interspecific associations in peatlands,with great disparity in body size of different plant groups.It appears more suitable to analyze interspecific associations among bryophytes and among bryophytes and vascular plants with small and large quadrats, respectively.
  • [1] 彭少麟,周厚诚,郭少聪.鼎湖山地带性植被种间联结变化研究[J].植物学报, 1999, 41(11): 1239-1244.
    [2] 王琳,张金屯.历山山地草甸优势种的种间关联和相关分析[J].西北植物学报, 2004, 24(8): 1435-1440.
    [3] Rydin H.Competition among bryophytes[J].Advance in Bryology, 1997, 6: 135-168.
    [4] Malmer N,Svensson B M,Wallen B.Interactions between Sphagnum mosses and field layer vascular plants in the development of peat-forming systems[J].Folia Geobot Phytotax, 1994, 29: 483-496.
    [5] Levine J M.Complex interactions in a streamside plant community[J].Ecology, 2000, 81(21): 3431-3444.
    [6] During H,Tooren B.Bryophyte interactions with other plants[J].Bot J Linn Soc, 1990, 104: 79-98.
    [7] Sohlberg E H,Bliss L C.Microscale pattern of vascular plant distribution in two high arctic plant communities[J].Can J Bot, 1984, 62: 2033-2042.
    [8] 郭志华,卓正大.庐山常绿阔叶、落叶阔叶混交林乔木种群种间联结性研究[J].植物生态学报, 1997, 21(5): 424-432.
    [9] 孙儒泳,李博,诸葛阳,尚玉昌.普通生态学[M].北京: 高等教育出版社, 1993.
    [10] 李刚,朱志红,王孝安,郭华.子午岭辽东栎群落乔木种间联结与取样面积[J].生态学杂志, 2008, 27(5): 689-696.
    [11] 王志国.吉林省金川泥炭纤维素稳定碳同位素组成序列与东北季风区五千多年来的环境变迁[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 1998, 17(1): 52-54.
    [12] 赵魁义.中国沼泽志[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
    [13] Schluter D.A variance test for detecting species association,with some example application[J].Ecology, 1984, 65: 998-1005.
    [14] 陈旭,卜兆君,王升忠,李鸿凯,赵红艳.长白山哈泥泥炭地两种生境苔藓与维管植物种间联结[J].草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 108-114.
    [15] Pielou E C.Mathematical Ecology[M].New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1977.
    [16] 张金屯.数量生态学[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 98-109.
    [17] Dale M R T.Quadrat covariance analysis and the scales of interspecific association during primary succession[J].J Veg Sci, 1991, 2: 103-112.
    [18] Greig-Smith P.Quantitative Plant Ecology[M].3rd ed.Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1991.
    [19] Gignac L D.Niche structure,resource partitioning, and species interactions of mire bryophytes relative to climatic and ecological gradients in western Canada[J].Bryologist, 1992, 95: 406-418.
    [20] Bragazza L.Sphagnum niche diversification in two oligotrophic mires in the southern Alps of Italy[J]. Bryologist, 1997, 100: 507-515.
    [21] 马进泽,卜兆君,郑星星,曾竞,赵高林.遮阴对两种泥炭藓植物生长及相互作用的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2012, 23(2): 357-362.
    [22] Rydin H.Competition and niche separation in Sphagnum[J]. Can J Bot, 1986, 64: 1817-1824.
    [23] Pedersen B,Hanslin H M,Bakken S.Testing for positive density-ependent performance in four bryophyte species[J].Ecology, 2001, 82: 70-88.
    [24] 卜兆君,陈旭,姜丽红,李鸿凯,赵红艳.苔藓植物相互作用的研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 2009, 22(2): 460-466.
    [25] 闫美芳,上官铁梁,张金屯,曹杨.五台山蓝花棘豆群落优势种群的种间关系分析[J].生态学杂志, 2006, 25(4): 354-358.
    [26] Nico Van Breemen.How sphagnum bogs down other plants[J]. REE, 1995, 10: 270-275.
    [27] 焦磊,张峰.汾河连伯滩湿地植被生态种组[J].林业科学, 2011, 47(4): 7-12.
    [28] Glime J M.Bryophyte ecology.Volume 1.Physiological ecology.(2007) [2012] .http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2835
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  2080
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-18
  • 修回日期:  2012-04-27
  • 发布日期:  2012-10-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回