东北红豆杉不同生境群落种间关联性

吴鑫磊; 龙婷; 徐超; 梁艳君; 韦健丽敏; 李景文

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.10031

东北红豆杉不同生境群落种间关联性

北京林业大学, 北京 100083

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0503106）。

详细信息

作者简介:
吴鑫磊(1997-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为保护生物学(E-mail:hnwuxinlei@163.com)。

通讯作者:
李景文,lijingwen@bjfu.edu.cn

中图分类号: Q948.15
计量
- 文章访问数: 345
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 208
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-23
- 修回日期: 2021-08-12
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-31
- 发布日期: 2022-02-27

Interspecific association of different communities in Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. habitat

Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Funds:

This work was supported by a grant from the National Key Research and Development Plan Project (2016YFC0503106).

摘要

摘要: 本研究在吉林省汪清县杜荒子林场东北红豆杉（Taxus cuspidata Sieb.et Zucc.）集中分布区进行调查，基于方差比率（VR）、Ochiai指数（OI）以及Spearman秩相关系数检验，对云冷杉林（群落1）、云冷杉林（群落2）和风桦林（群落3）等3个群落进行了种间关联性分析。结果显示：3个群落的方差比率VR均小于1，其中3号群落主要物种总体呈显著负关联，而其他两个群落呈不显著负关联；OI分析结果表明1号和2号群落的高关联度（0.6 < OI ≤ 1）物种对比3号群落的占比更高，东北红豆杉与主要树种的平均OI从1号到3号群落依次降低；Spearman秩相关系数检验结果发现大部分物种间相关性不显著，只有1号群落的正负关联比大于1；云冷杉林物种间的总体联结度较为紧密，稳定性也较高，而风桦林的情况与此相反。
- 东北红豆杉 /
- 野外回归 /
- 生境 /
- 种间联结 /
- 种间相关性
Abstract: This study investigated the concentrated distribution area of Taxus cuspidata Sieb.et Zucc. in Duhuangzi forest farm, Wangqing County, Jilin Province, China. Based on variance ratio (VR), Ochiai index (OI), and Spearman rank correlation coefficients, the interspecific associations of three communities were analyzed, including spruce-fir forest (community 1), spruce-fir forest (community 2), and birch forest (community 3). Results showed that the VR values of the three communities were all less than 1, and the main species in community 3 showed a significant negative correlation, while the other two communities showed no significant negative correlation. Based on OI, the species with high correlation (0.6 < OI ≤ 1) in communities 1 and 2 accounted for a higher proportion than that in community 3. Average OI between T.cuspidata and major tree species decreased from community 1 to 3. Based on Spearman rank correlation coefficients, most species showed no significant correlation. Only the positive and negative correlation ratio of community 1 was greater than 1. The overall association between species in the spruce-fir forest was relatively close and stability was high, while the situation in the birch forest showed the opposite pattern.
- Taxus cuspidata /
- Field regression /
- Habitat /
- Interspecific association /
- Interspeci-fic correlation

HTML全文

参考文献(38)

[1]	郑万钧. 中国树木志[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1983:386-387.
[2]	吴榜华, 戚继忠. 东北红豆杉植物地理学研究[J]. 应用与环境生物学报. 1995(3):219-225. Wu BH, Qi JZ. Study on phytogeography of Taxus cuspidata[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 1995(3):219-225.
[3]	龙婷, 陈杰, 杨蓝, 王寅, 徐超, 等. 极小种群东北红豆杉所在群落特征及其环境解释[J]. 植物科学学报, 2020, 38(1):77-87 Long T, Chen J, Yang L, Wang Y, Xu C, et al. Characteristics and environmental interpretation of communities of Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc., a plant species with extremely small populations[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2020, 38(1):77-87.
[4]	杨蓝. 东北红豆杉所在群落特征及其影响因子分析[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2018.
[5]	张悦, 郭利平, 易雪梅, 曹伟, 王远遐, 等. 长白山北坡3个森林群落主要树种种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1):106-115. Zhang Y, Guo LP, Yi XM, Cao W, Wang YX, et al. Analysis of interspecific associations among major tree species in three forest communities on the north slope of Changbai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(1):106115.
[6]	Yu DP, Zhou L, Zhou WM, Ding H, Wang QW, et al. Forest management in northeast China:history, problems, and challenges[J]. Environ Manage, 2011, 48(6):1122-1135.
[7]	Wani MC, Taylor HL, Wall ME, Coggon P, Mcphail AT. Plant antitumor agents. Ⅵ. The isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 1971, 93(9):2325-2327.
[8]	陈杰, 龙婷, 杨蓝, 王寅, 徐超, 李景文. 东北红豆杉生境适宜性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(4):51-59. Chen J, Long T, Yang L, Wang Y, Xu C, Li JW. Habitat suitability assessment of Taxus cuspidata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(4):51-59.
[9]	张春雨, 高露双, 赵亚洲, 贾玉珍, 李金鑫, 赵秀海. 东北红豆杉雌雄植株径向生长对邻体竞争和气候因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6):1177-1183. Zhang CY, Gao LS, Zhao YZ, Ja YZ, Li JX, Zhao XH. Response of radial growth to neighboring competition and climate factors in Taxus cuspidata[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(6):1177-1183.
[10]	尹雪, 穆立蔷, 李中跃, 韩明浩. 3种鸟类对东北红豆杉的取食方式及传播[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(1):81-85. Yin X, Mu LQ, Li ZY, Han MH. Fruits foraging patterns and seed dispersal effect of three kinds of birds on Taxus cuspidata[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(1):81-85.
[11]	覃海宁, 杨永, 董仕勇, 何强, 贾渝, 等. 中国高等植物受威胁物种名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(7):696-744. Qin HN, Yang Y, Dong SY, He Q, Jia Y, et al. Threatened species list of China's higher plants[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2017, 25(7):696-744.
[12]	臧润国, 董鸣, 李俊清, 陈小勇, 曾宋君, 等. 典型极小种群野生植物保护与恢复技术研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7130-7135. Zang RG, Dong M, Li JQ, Chen XY, Zeng SJ, et al. Conservation and restoration for typical critically endangered wild plants with extremely small population[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22):7130-7135.
[13]	刘本玉. 辽西地区东北红豆杉引种繁育技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(24):154-155.
[14]	丰美静, 张恺恺, 黄中文, 邱德有, 陈段芬, 杨艳芳. 东北红豆杉温室扦插繁殖试验[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(13):6570. Feng MJ, Zhang KK, Huang ZW, Qiu DY, Chen DF, Yang YF. Experiment of cuttage propagation of Taxus cuspidata in greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(13):65-70.
[15]	王冰. 东北红豆杉快速繁殖技术的研究[D]. 延吉:延边大学, 2015.
[16]	刁云飞, 刘延坤, 刘玉龙, 田松岩. 穆棱东北红豆杉种群结构特征[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2020, 50(4):391397. Diao YF, Liu YK, Liu YL, Tian SY. Population structure characteristics of Taxus cuspidata[J]. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2020, 50(4):391-397.
[17]	刁云飞, 金光泽, 田松岩, 刘延坤, 刘玉龙, 等. 黑龙江省穆棱东北红豆杉林物种组成与群落结构[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5):26-36. Diao YF, Jin GZ, Tian SY, Liu YK, Liu YK, et al. Species composition and community structure of a Taxus cuspidata forest in muling nature reserve of Heilongjiang province, China[J]. Sclentia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5):26-36.
[18]	刘丹, 郭忠玲, 崔晓阳, 范春楠. 5种东北红豆杉植物群丛及其物种多样性的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3):340-349. Liu D, Guo ZL, Cui XY, Fan CN. Comparison of five associations of Taxus cuspidata and their species diversity[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2020, 28(3):340-349.
[19]	刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 魏海, 宋治清, 等. 耦合恢复力的林区土地生态适宜性评价——以吉林省汪清县为例[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(3):476-487. Liu YX, Wang YL, Peng J, Wei H, Song ZQ, et al. Land ecological suitability assessment for forest coupled with the resilience perspective:a case study in Wangqing county, Jilin province, China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(3):476-487.
[20]	杜志, 亢新刚, 包昱君, 杨鑫霞. 长白山云冷杉林不同演替阶段的树种空间分布格局及其关联性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(2):14-19. Du Z, Kang XG, Bao YJ, Yang XX. Spatial distribution patterns and associations of tree species during different succession stages in spruce-fir forests of Changbai Mountains, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(2):14-19.
[21]	闫琰, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山不同演替阶段针阔混交林群落物种多度分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(9):923-934. Yan Y, Zhang CY, Zhao XH. Species-abundance distribution patterns at different successional stages of conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest communities in Changbai Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(9):923-934.
[22]	刘巍, 曹伟. 长白山云冷杉群落主要种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(8):1766-1774. Liu W, Cao W. Niche characteristics of main plant species in spruce-fir forests in Changbai Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(8):1766-1774.
[23]	龚直文, 顾丽, 亢新刚, 杨华, 赵浩彦. 长白山森林次生演替过程中林木空间格局研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2):92-99. Gong ZW, Gu L, Kang XG, Yang H, Zhao HY. Spatial pattern of forests during secondary succession in Changbai Mountain, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2):92-99.
[24]	方精云, 朱江玲, 郭兆迪, 王襄平, 沈泽昊, 等. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6):533-548. Fang JY, Zhu JL, Guo ZD, Wang XP, Shen ZH, et al. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6):533-548.
[25]	Schluter D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3):998-1005.
[26]	Liu L, Wang X, Wen Q, Jia Q, Liu Q. Interspecific associations of plant populations in rare earth mining wasteland in southern China[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2017, 118:82-88.
[27]	徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 刘彤. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233. Xu MH, Liu M, Zhai DT, Liu T. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233.
[28]	Bishara AJ, Hittner JB. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data:comparison of pearson, spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches[J]. Psychol Methods, 2012, 17(3):399-417.
[29]	刘润红, 姜勇, 常斌, 李娇凤, 荣春艳, 等. 漓江河岸带枫杨群落主要木本植物种间联结与相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19):6881-6893. Liu RH, Jiang Y, Chang B, Li JF, Rong CY, et al. Interspecific associations and correlations among the main woody plants in a Pterocarya stenoptera community in a riparian zone of Lijiang River, Guilin, Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(19):6881-6893.
[30]	李帅锋, 郎学东, 黄小波, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 藤枣生境地木本植物种间关联性与群落稳定性[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3):350-357. Li SF, Lang XD, Huang XB, Liu WD, Su JR, et al. Interspecific association of woody plant species and community stability in the Eleutharrhena macrocarpa habitat[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2020, 28(3):350-357.
[31]	张腾, 郑秋敏, 王玉玲, 刘宇飞, 王茜, 陶建平. 缙云秋海棠与主要伴生物种的种间关联性研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 44(9):52-59. Zhang T, Zheng QM, Wang YL, Liu YF, Wang Q, Tao JP. On interspecific association for Begonia jinyunensis and its major associated species[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 44(9):52-59.
[32]	沈雪梨, 吴远密, 朱艺璇, 童玲, 胡巧立, 等. 濒危植物百花山葡萄群落物种生态位特征与种间联结研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2020, 38(2):195-204. Shen XL, Wu YM, Zhu YX, Tong L, Hu QL, et al. Community niche characteristics and interspecific associations of critically endangered species, Vitis baihuashanensis M. S. Kang et D. Z. Lu[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2020, 38(2):195-204.
[33]	张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 张岗岗, 刘璞, 等. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1):12-21. Zhang MX, Wang DX, Kang B, Zhang GG, Liu P, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Pinus armandii in Qinling Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1):12-21.
[34]	黄世能, 李意德, 骆土寿, 王伯荪. 海南岛尖峰岭次生热带山地雨林树种间的联结动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000(5):569-574. Huang SN, Li YD, Luo TS, Wang BS. Dynamics of associations between tree species in a secondary tropical montane rain forest at Jianfengling on Hainan island[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000(5):569-574.
[35]	李云灵. 东北红豆杉种间关系研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2008.
[36]	柳剑丽, 王宗礼, 李平, 高娃. 锡林郭勒典型草原不同群落物种间关系的数量分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(5):74-79. Liu JL, Wang ZL, Li P, Gao W. Quantitative analysis of relationships among species of different communities in typical steppe in Xilingol[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2013, 35(5):74-79.
[37]	龚容, 高琼, 王亚林. 围封对温带半干旱典型草原群落种间关联的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6):554-563. Gong R, Gao Q, Wang YL. Effects of exclosure on community inter-specific relationships in a typical temperate grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(6):554-563.
[38]	叶权平, 张文辉, 于世川, 薛文艳. 桥山林区麻栎群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(9):3165-3174. Ye QP, Zhang WH, Yu SC, Xue WY. Interspecific association of the main tree populations of the Quercus acutissima community in the Qiaoshan forest area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(9):3165-3174.