Niche and Interspecific Association of Species of Taxus yunnanensis Communities in Northwest Yunnan Province
-
摘要: 在对滇西北云南红豆杉(Taxus yunnanensis)群落的野外调查基础上,采用生态位宽度、生态位重叠和基于2× 2联列表的χ2检验、联结系数(AC)的方法,分析了群落种群间的相互关系。结果表明:物种的重要值与相对应的生态位宽度存在着极显著正相关;云南红豆杉、丽江铁杉(Tsuga forrestii)与青荚叶(Helwingia japonica)的生态位宽度大于其它种群;在1225个种对中有48.16%的生态位重叠值为0,同时χ2统计量中有4%为中性联结,说明群落中木本植物种群间资源利用性竞争较强。生态位宽度较大的种群间往往生态位重叠也较大;云南红豆杉与丽江铁杉之间的生态位重叠值要明显高于与其它种群的,Schoener指数为0.875。χ2检验表明云南红豆杉与其它种群之间表现为无联结。联结系数中显著负联结的种对要多于显著正联结,群落物种受到较大的外来干扰。联结系数与生态位重叠值之间存在极显著正相关,并能用Cubic指数建立回归方程模型。Abstract: Field data collection was based on 3200 m2 plots (including 8 subplots) in Taxus yunnanensis communities distributed in northwest Yunnan province.Methods including niche breadth,niche overlap,chi-square test,and association coefficient (AC) based on a 2× 2 contingency table were used for analyzing the interaction between the species population.Results showed significant positive correlation (p<0.001) between the importance value and corresponding niche breadth.The niche breadth of Taxus yunnanensis,Tsuga forrestii,and Helwingia japonica were larger than other populations.The niche overlap of 48.16% of species pairs was 0 in 1225 species pairs and 4% of species pairs showed neutral association in chi-square test,which indicated a stronger resource utilization competition on different populations.Simultaneously,niche breadth increased with niche overlap.The niche overlap of species pair of between Taxus yunnanensis and Tsuga forrestii was larger than species pairs between Taxus yunnanensis and other populations.The Schoener index was 0.875.Chi-square results showed that there was no association between Taxus yunnanensis and other populations.For AC,the proportion of negative association was more than positive association,which showed that the community had a larger external disturbance.There was a significant positive correlation between association coefficient and niche overlap and the model was Cubic index.
-
Keywords:
- Taxus yunnanensis /
- Niche breadth /
- Niche overlap /
- Interspecific association /
- Regression analysis
-
-
[1] 王祥福,郭泉水,巴哈尔古丽,刘正宇,任明波.崖柏群落优势乔木种群生态位[J].林业科学, 2008, 44(4): 6-13. [2] Parrish J A D,Bazzaz F A.Competitive interactions in plant communities of different successional ages[J].Ecology, 1982, 63(2): 314-320. [3] Levine J M,HillePisLambers J.The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity[J].Nature, 2009, 461(10): 254-258. [4] 郭泉水,包奋强,王祥福,池秀莲,马超.三尖杉所属群落优势乔木树种种间关系[J].林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5): 662-668. [5] 胡理乐,李新,江明喜,黄汉东,满金山,苏长江.宣恩七姊妹山珙桐群落种间联结分析[J].武汉植物学研究, 2003, 21(3): 203-208. [6] 史作民,刘世荣,程瑞梅,蒋有绪.宝天曼落叶阔叶林种间联结性研究[J].林业科学, 2001, 37(2): 29-35. [7] 李先琨,黄玉清,苏宗明.南方红豆杉群落主要树木种群间联结关系初步研究[J].生态学杂志, 1999, 18(3): 10-14. [8] 张志勇,陶德定,李德珠.五针白皮松在群落演替过程中的种间联结性分析[J].生物多样性, 2003, 11(2): 125-131. [9] 苏建荣,张志钧,邓疆,李国松.云南红豆杉的地理分布与气候关系[J].林业科学研究, 2005, 18(5): 510-515. [10] 苏建荣,张志钧,邓疆,陈智勇.云南红豆杉种群结构与生命表分析[J].林业科学研究, 2005, 18(6): 651-656. [11] 赵则海,祖元刚,杨逢建,丛沛桐.东灵山辽东栎林木本植物种间联结取样技术的研究[J].植物生态学报, 2003, 27(3): 396-403. [12] 铁军,张晶,彭林鹏,杨林森,胡德夫,张志祥.神农架川金丝猴栖息地优势树种生态位及食源植物[J].植物生态学报, 2009, 33(3): 482-491. [13] 刘春生,刘鹏,张志祥,李成惠,黄帮文,罗建峰,金婷婷.九龙山濒危植物南方铁杉的生态位研究[J].武汉植物学研究, 2009, 27(1): 55-61. [14] Feinsinger P,Spears E E,Poole R W.A simple measure of niche breadth[J].Ecology, 1981, 62(1): 27-32. [15] 张金屯,数量生态学方法[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1995. [16] 康冰,刘世荣,温远光,张跃进,姜在民,常建国.广西大青山南亚热带次生林演替过程的种群动态[J].植物生态学报, 2006, 30(6): 931-940. [17] 王乃江,张文辉,陆元昌,范少辉,王勇.陕西子午岭森林植物群落种间联结性[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(1): 67-78. [18] 李菁,骆有庆,石娟,马凌云,陈超.阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林下植物种群生态位[J].林业科学研究, 2011, 24(5): 651-658. [19] 苏志尧,吴大荣,陈北光.粤北天然林优势种群生态位研究[J].应用生态学报, 2003, 24(1): 25-29. [20] 胡正华,钱海源,于明坚.古田山国家级自然保护区甜槠林优势种群生态位[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(7): 3670-3677. [21] 高俊香,鲁小珍,马力,胡绍庆,周丽飞,马毅.凤阳山常绿阔叶林乔木层优势种群生态位分析[J].南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 34(4): 157-160. [22] 李帅锋,刘万德,苏建荣,张志钧.季风常绿阔叶林不同恢复阶段乔木优势种群生态位和种间联结[J].生态学杂志, 2011, 30(3): 508-515. [23] 史作民,程瑞梅,刘世荣.宝天曼落叶阔叶林种群生态位特征[J].应用生态学报, 1999, 10(3): 265-269.
计量
- 文章访问数: 2542
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 2099
下载:
